<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History of typography: Old Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brief History of Type—Part&#160;5 &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-8954</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brief History of Type—Part&#160;5 &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-8954</guid>
		<description>[...] Type History 2: Old Style [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Type History 2: Old Style [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brief History of&#160;Type &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-7802</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brief History of&#160;Type &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-7802</guid>
		<description>[...] Type Terms 2: Old Style [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Type Terms 2: Old Style [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eXtreme Type&#160;Terminology &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-6038</link>
		<dc:creator>eXtreme Type&#160;Terminology &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-6038</guid>
		<description>[...] The humanist, or Venetian typefaces followed, a style that more closely resembled handwriting. Old style, old face, or garalde type. Garalde, a term rarely used now, is a mash-up of the names Garamond and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The humanist, or Venetian typefaces followed, a style that more closely resembled handwriting. Old style, old face, or garalde type. Garalde, a term rarely used now, is a mash-up of the names Garamond and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipográfiai kiefejezésmód - Nyomdászati összefoglaló &#171; Zooley&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipográfiai kiefejezésmód - Nyomdászati összefoglaló &#171; Zooley&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>[...] Type Terminology: HumanistPart2: Type Terminology: Old StylePart3: Type Terms: Transitional Type  Explore posts in the same categories: Fonts, design, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Type Terminology: HumanistPart2: Type Terminology: Old StylePart3: Type Terms: Transitional Type  Explore posts in the same categories: Fonts, design, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terminologia de Tipos:&#160;Humanista &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>Terminologia de Tipos:&#160;Humanista &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2: Type Terminology&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;Old Style   Translated by Miguel&#160;Batista.   Be sure to share the love:                Discuss, Comment or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Part 2: Type Terminology&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;Old Style   Translated by Miguel&nbsp;Batista.   Be sure to share the love:                Discuss, Comment or [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Type: Potato&#160;Type &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Type: Potato&#160;Type &#124; i love typography, the typography blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>[...] back to early-eighteenth century France to take a closer look at the types that followed the Old Style forms like Garamond. We also have some more great interviews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] back to early-eighteenth century France to take a closer look at the types that followed the Old Style forms like Garamond. We also have some more great interviews [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaas</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>A book mentioned above, &#039;Schriften erkennen&#039; by Hans Peter Willberg, about recognizing typefaces and classification, is readily available (German language) from Amazon.de. It costs only 12,80 euro. An English book by the same author is &#039;Getting it Right With Type&#039;, also still available.
I just bought &#039;Counterpunch&#039; by Fred Smeijers. He links 16th century type making with contemporary type design. Good for me, since I&#039;m all for contemporary typefaces, solidly based on tradition.
-love this site and will keep following the &#039;type terms&#039; posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A book mentioned above, &#8216;Schriften erkennen&#8217; by Hans Peter Willberg, about recognizing typefaces and classification, is readily available (German language) from Amazon.de. It costs only 12,80 euro. An English book by the same author is &#8216;Getting it Right With Type&#8217;, also still available.<br />
I just bought &#8216;Counterpunch&#8217; by Fred Smeijers. He links 16th century type making with contemporary type design. Good for me, since I&#8217;m all for contemporary typefaces, solidly based on tradition.<br />
-love this site and will keep following the &#8216;type terms&#8217; posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldstyle &#171; Publication Design</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldstyle &#171; Publication Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>[...] of explanations of type terms. This one is on oldstyle typefaces such as Garamond, Bembo and Weiss. Link &gt;    Filed under: Typography  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of explanations of type terms. This one is on oldstyle typefaces such as Garamond, Bembo and Weiss. Link &gt;    Filed under: Typography  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gia</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>Gia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>Old Style yeah!! I&#039;m a sucker for pretty fonts :)

And since LeMonde was mentioned... most of Porchez Typofonderie&#039;s work is really amazing....maybe we get to see a post soon related to some of their work ? :) Costa for example is gorgeous...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Style yeah!! I&#8217;m a sucker for pretty fonts :)</p>
<p>And since LeMonde was mentioned&#8230; most of Porchez Typofonderie&#8217;s work is really amazing&#8230;.maybe we get to see a post soon related to some of their work ? :) Costa for example is gorgeous&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/11/21/type-terminology-old-style/#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>As usual, I liked this article very much. 

However, since I am firmly in the category of iLT readers called New To Typography (why not categorize ourselves as well? hah), I take it very slow and read the articles over several times, especially the ones on type classification. I like to take the fonts you (John) give us as examples, and look them up (at MyFonts) to see if I can find the nuances. Very awesome way to procrastinate ... oh, and learn. 

However, this time I had trouble identifying the font (out of the four) that is Old Style, because I didn&#039;t realize that Old Style fonts, while having a more upright stress, still do not have a &lt;i&gt;completely&lt;/i&gt; upright stress. John, you write,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Another major change can be seen in the stress of the letterforms (figure 1.2) to a more perpendicular (upright) position...&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Which, to me, was a bit vague, I suppose.

Now, I don&#039;t want to come off that I&#039;m criticizing! I&#039;m not blaming anyone, just saying what my silly mistake was, in case anyone else learns from it, or might have felt the same. I found that having Robin Williams&#039; book &quot;The Non-Designer&#039;s Type Book&quot; open to page 22 (Oldstyle) helped too, because that&#039;s one of her identifying characteristics (the still-diagonal stress).

So, I guess I would also be one of those people asking for a solutions page!

Now enough about stress! I hope you&#039;re not too stressed on your trip, John, and that the rest of you aren&#039;t too stressed either. And, of course, I&#039;m looking forward to whatever iLT has to say next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, I liked this article very much. </p>
<p>However, since I am firmly in the category of iLT readers called New To Typography (why not categorize ourselves as well? hah), I take it very slow and read the articles over several times, especially the ones on type classification. I like to take the fonts you (John) give us as examples, and look them up (at MyFonts) to see if I can find the nuances. Very awesome way to procrastinate &#8230; oh, and learn. </p>
<p>However, this time I had trouble identifying the font (out of the four) that is Old Style, because I didn&#8217;t realize that Old Style fonts, while having a more upright stress, still do not have a <i>completely</i> upright stress. John, you write,</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Another major change can be seen in the stress of the letterforms (figure 1.2) to a more perpendicular (upright) position&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Which, to me, was a bit vague, I suppose.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t want to come off that I&#8217;m criticizing! I&#8217;m not blaming anyone, just saying what my silly mistake was, in case anyone else learns from it, or might have felt the same. I found that having Robin Williams&#8217; book &#8220;The Non-Designer&#8217;s Type Book&#8221; open to page 22 (Oldstyle) helped too, because that&#8217;s one of her identifying characteristics (the still-diagonal stress).</p>
<p>So, I guess I would also be one of those people asking for a solutions page!</p>
<p>Now enough about stress! I hope you&#8217;re not too stressed on your trip, John, and that the rest of you aren&#8217;t too stressed either. And, of course, I&#8217;m looking forward to whatever iLT has to say next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via cdn.ilovetypography.com

Served from: ilovetypography.com @ 2012-02-09 13:39:02 -->
