<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smashing typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logo Designers</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo Designers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Johnno - I love that &#039;Warnock Pro Semi Bold Display&#039;. - I also like BrushScript MT - I wouldnt put the latter in my top 10 but definetely in my top 80.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Johnno - I love that &#8216;Warnock Pro Semi Bold Display&#8217;. - I also like BrushScript MT - I wouldnt put the latter in my top 10 but definetely in my top 80.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspirationbit</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>inspirationbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>oh, you didn&#039;t have to... but thanks so much for this great promo of my blog here :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, you didn&#8217;t have to&#8230; but thanks so much for this great promo of my blog here :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johno</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Yes, the excitement was too much. I&#039;ll try again:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://inspirationbit.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://ilovetypography.com/img/warnock3.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the excitement was too much. I&#8217;ll try again:</p>
<p><a href="http://inspirationbit.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://cdn.ilovetypography.com/img/warnock3.png" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspirationbit</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>inspirationbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I can see the &quot;trembling&quot; - you missed the first &quot;n&quot; in Inspiration :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the &#8220;trembling&#8221; - you missed the first &#8220;n&#8221; in Inspiration :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johno</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Vivien
Thanks for the compliment. My favourite of the Warnock family, is this font:


&lt;img src=&quot;http://ilovetypography.com/img/warnock1.png&quot; /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Warnock Pro Semi Bold Display&lt;/em&gt;. Makes me go weak at the knees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivien<br />
Thanks for the compliment. My favourite of the Warnock family, is this font:</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.ilovetypography.com/img/warnock1.png" /><br />
<em>Warnock Pro Semi Bold Display</em>. Makes me go weak at the knees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspirationbit</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>inspirationbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I was always a big fan of Georgia, especially the way numbers are designed. Just look at your comment&#039;s and post&#039;s date formatting - absolutely gorgeous!

I also like AvantGarde and Warnock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always a big fan of Georgia, especially the way numbers are designed. Just look at your comment&#8217;s and post&#8217;s date formatting - absolutely gorgeous!</p>
<p>I also like AvantGarde and Warnock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johno</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 02:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I agree, Garamond is great. But, as with any top-whatever list, they are always served-up with a large helping of subjectivity. I plan to run some sort of ongoing poll for my own list of, say, top 20 best typefaces. I also hope to do this kind of thing for the best/favourite glyph in any typeface.

I&#039;m also no great fan of Eurostile, and am a little surprised to see it in the list--much too square for my liking:

&lt;img src=&quot;http://ilovetypography.com/img/Eurostil.png&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Garamond is great. But, as with any top-whatever list, they are always served-up with a large helping of subjectivity. I plan to run some sort of ongoing poll for my own list of, say, top 20 best typefaces. I also hope to do this kind of thing for the best/favourite glyph in any typeface.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also no great fan of Eurostile, and am a little surprised to see it in the list&#8212;much too square for my liking:</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.ilovetypography.com/img/Eurostil.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurenMarie - Creative Curio</title>
		<link>http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurenMarie - Creative Curio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovetypography.com/2007/08/10/smashing-typography/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe Garamond wasn&#039;t on there! And no Caslon either! *gasp* What were they thinking???  Actually, there was quite an absence of serif fonts. I think for the most part I&#039;m more partial to serifs than sans serif fonts. They are more elegant to me.

I really like Century Gothic (left that one out!), because it varies its stroke weights and it&#039;s not a blah sans serif like many can be. I&#039;m not a big fan of Eurostile, which they included, but that&#039;s probably just me.

I&#039;m actually quite shocked at many of the classic faces they left out! But maybe they didn&#039;t fit the aim of “bulletproof” fonts that can be &quot;used effectively in almost every Corporate Design.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe Garamond wasn&#8217;t on there! And no Caslon either! *gasp* What were they thinking???  Actually, there was quite an absence of serif fonts. I think for the most part I&#8217;m more partial to serifs than sans serif fonts. They are more elegant to me.</p>
<p>I really like Century Gothic (left that one out!), because it varies its stroke weights and it&#8217;s not a blah sans serif like many can be. I&#8217;m not a big fan of Eurostile, which they included, but that&#8217;s probably just me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually quite shocked at many of the classic faces they left out! But maybe they didn&#8217;t fit the aim of “bulletproof” fonts that can be &#8220;used effectively in almost every Corporate Design.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via cdn.ilovetypography.com

Served from: ilovetypography.com @ 2012-02-09 09:35:52 -->
